Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
Commit 52bc5b41 authored by Jueun Park's avatar Jueun Park
Browse files

Update

parent 9bc76781
No related branches found
No related tags found
No related merge requests found
Pipeline #11531 passed with warnings
......@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ To sum up, following three questions are formulated as research questions:
\item{\textbf{RQ3 : Which advantages can RAG provide with its features at expressing testing approaches?}}
\end{description}
\textbf{RQ1} is intended to investigate which approaches might be able to implement in RAG. Corresponding literatures are introduced in Section 3. \\ \textbf{RQ2} focuses on the implementation the data structure and testing methods in RAG and is answered in Section 4 and Section 5. \\ Results for \textbf{RQ3} shows concretely which features (attributes) of RAG are used and which benefits exist at this point.
\textbf{RQ1} is intended to investigate which approaches might be able to implement in RAG. Corresponding literatures are introduced in Section 3. \\ \textbf{RQ2} focuses on the implementation the data structure and testing methods in RAG and is answered in Section 4 and Section 5. \\ In Section 6, Results for \textbf{RQ3} shows concretely which features (attributes) of RAG are used and which benefits exist at this point.
% [1] https://swagger.io/specification/
% [2] Basu, Anirban (2015). Software Quality Assurance, Testing and Metrics. PHI Learning. ISBN 978-81-203-5068-7.
\ No newline at end of file
0% Loading or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Please register or to comment