@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ To sum up, following three questions are formulated as research questions:
\item{\textbf{RQ3 : Which advantages can RAG provide with its features at expressing testing approaches?}}
\end{description}
\textbf{RQ1} is intended to investigate which approaches might be able to implement in RAG. Corresponding literatures are introduced in Section 3. \\\textbf{RQ2} focuses on the implementation the data structure and testing methods in RAG and is answered in Section 4 and Section 5. \\ Results for \textbf{RQ3} shows concretely which features (attributes) of RAG are used and which benefits exist at this point.
\textbf{RQ1} is intended to investigate which approaches might be able to implement in RAG. Corresponding literatures are introduced in Section 3. \\\textbf{RQ2} focuses on the implementation the data structure and testing methods in RAG and is answered in Section 4 and Section 5. \\In Section 6, Results for \textbf{RQ3} shows concretely which features (attributes) of RAG are used and which benefits exist at this point.
% [1] https://swagger.io/specification/
% [2] Basu, Anirban (2015). Software Quality Assurance, Testing and Metrics. PHI Learning. ISBN 978-81-203-5068-7.
