ILP-Generation.md

@@ -33,15 +33,19 @@ for-all implementations i
 Introduce binary variables for "implementation i" chosen, additionally to the
 "implementation i deployed on pe" variables, greatly reducing the size of architectural constraints.
 
+(1) Important question, where will the required components be declared – Comp, Impl or Mode.
+  Here done at Impl-Level – inconsistent with the AST-rules.
+
 ```
 for all components c
   constraint_c = "1" "="
   for-all (impls-of c) i
-    constraint_c += (varname i) "+"
-    constraint_i  = "0" "=" "-" (varname i)
-    for-all PEs pe
-      constraint_i +=  "+" (varname i-deployed-on-pe)
-    for-all (req-comp i) rc
+    constraint_i = "0" "=" "-" (varname i)
+    for-all (modes-of i) m
+      constraint_c += (varname m) "+"
+      for-all PEs pe
+        constraint_i +=  "+" (varname i-in-m-deployed-on-pe)
+    for-all (req-comp i) rc									(1)
       constraint_rc = "0" "=" "-" (varname i)
       for-all (impls-of rc) rci
         constraint_rc = "+" (varname rci)
@@ -50,6 +54,10 @@ for all components c
   constraints += constraint_c
 ```
 
+In scheme: to-ilp auf impl gib ein paar zurück, so dass
+- (car paar)  = liste von '(varname m) +'
+- (cadr paar) = liste mit constraints der form '0 = - {(varname i)}* {{+ (varname i-in-m-deployed-on-pe)}*}*'
+
 ### Resource/Software NFP Negotiation
 
 Nicht so leicht abbildbar, wenn nicht nur nach der 'Direction' der Properties